100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
PSCI 1100 Midterm Exam Questions With Correct Answers. $11.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

PSCI 1100 Midterm Exam Questions With Correct Answers.

 7 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • PSCI 1100
  • Institution
  • PSCI 1100

PSCI 1100 Midterm Exam Questions With Correct Answers. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) - answer-How did court rule? rules that Congress has the power to incorporate the bank and that Maryland couldn't tax instruments of the national government employed in the execution of constitutional powers -B...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 8  pages

  • August 29, 2024
  • 8
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • PSCI 1100
  • PSCI 1100
avatar-seller
Thebright
©THEBRIGHT EXAM STUDY SOLUTIONS 8/22/2024 12:54 PM



PSCI 1100 Midterm Exam Questions
With Correct Answers.

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) - answer✔✔-How did court rule?
rules that Congress has the power to incorporate the bank and that Maryland couldn't tax
instruments of the national government employed in the execution of constitutional powers
-Broader significance
Court rules that congress has implied powers because of necessary and proper clause.

Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) - answer✔✔-How did the court rule?
Regulation of steamboat operators involves interstate commerce and is therefore reserved to
Congress under the Commerce Clause. National government has sole control over interstate
commerce, which means state laws become invalid in the face of national law.
-Broader significance
Expands power of congress and promotes federal supremacy

Wickard v. Filburn (1942) - answer✔✔-How did the court rule?
Court finds that Commerce Clause gives Congress power to regulate prices, and the law in
question relates to this power
-Broader significance
Commerce clause

Engel v. Vitale (1962) - answer✔✔-How did the court rule?
Holds that state cannot hold prayers in public schools, even if it is voluntary and non-
denominational
-Broader significance
Violates the establishment clause, breaches the constitutional wall of separation between church
and state. Shows that court protects the rights of minorities even when it is unpopular to do so
(countermajoritarian)

, ©THEBRIGHT EXAM STUDY SOLUTIONS 8/22/2024 12:54 PM

Texas v. Johnson (1989) - answer✔✔-How did the court rule?
Court rules that TX law banning burning of flag is constitutional, and that flag burning is
protected speech. TX doesn't have a compelling state interest.
-Broader significance
Holds that speech can include actions and non-verbal messages. 1st amendment protects
individual when their message/opinion is disliked by society.

Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) - answer✔✔-How did the court rule?
Rules in favor of Griswold (Planned Parenthood) because the Constitution has penumbras,
especially a right to privacy
-Broader significance
Transforms landscape regarding whether states can ban birth control pills, precursor to Roe v.
Wade. Establishes a constitutional right to privacy, which will be used in Roe and Casey.

Roe v. Wade (1973) - answer✔✔-How did the court rule?
SCOTUS rules that there is a constitutional right to abortion, invalidates many pre-existing state
laws.
-Broader significance
Grounds right to abortion in 14th amendment, but also 9th amendment. Although women can
get abortions, state also has compelling interest in protecting fetus, so establishes a trimester
framework with exceptions for women's health.

Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) - answer✔✔-How did the court rule?
Upholds most of the PA provisions, but established an undue burden test, defined as a
"substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion before the fetus attains
viability"
-Broader significance
Reaffirms Roe, even with a more conservative court.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022) - answer✔✔-How did the court rule?
No constitutional right to abortion, overrules Roe and Casey
-Broader significance
Shows how government is becoming increasingly more conservative, republican state majorities
and conservative SCOTUS. Ignores stare decisis by overturning legal precedent.

Missouri Compromise of 1820 - answer✔✔-Strictly political situation

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Thebright. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $11.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77016 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$11.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart