100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Webcare Lecture Notes $5.16   Add to cart

Class notes

Webcare Lecture Notes

 32 views  2 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

All lecture notes of the course Webcare to pass the exam. Written in a summarised and compact way. -- Part of the Master Communication and Information Sciences at Tilburg University.

Preview 4 out of 31  pages

  • January 19, 2023
  • 31
  • 2022/2023
  • Class notes
  • Christine liebrecht
  • All classes
avatar-seller
Webcare Lectures
Lecture 1: Introduction to Webcare
Webcare: The act of engaging in online interactions with (Complaining) consumers, by actively
searching the web to address consumer feedback (e.g. questions, concerns, and complaints ~ Van
Noort & Willemsen, 2012

In practice we can go back to 2010. KLM first engaged in conversation with customer complaints.
Beneficial because they could help people but also good for reputation management.
First only 1 employee now over a 100 employees monitoring social media and engaging in webcare.

90% of (large) organisations engages in webcare




Goals of webcare:




Webcare for customer care
- KLM is present on (Almost) every dosical media channel
- Messages about luggage, flights, reservation, delays, rebooking etc.
- Aim to respond within 50 minutes, in 14 different alnguages, 24/7

Customer care:
- Signal customer problems and solve them
- Meet or exceed the expectations of customers
- Customer’s negative ewom to positive ewom, recommendations

Webcare for public relations
- Others are watching too
- eWOM can influence people’s impression of the organisation (e.g. trust)
- organisation’s webcare demonstrates customers’ comments are taken seriously
- prevent (N)eWOM → crisis
- reputation & relationship management

individual vs. collective

,webcare for marketing purposes
- creating a good image
- enhancing brand evaluations
- message could go viral
- could convince others to purchase
- valuable feedback to improve their businesses
o e.g. KLM improved lost and found services when they saw people complaining
- webcare → social media campaigns (repost positive responses on own social media)

Developments of webcare:
Amount of customer messages per week for KLM (in 2015) –
60,000
➔ reasons for customer service chatbots.
➔ Increasing adoption of automated responses in
webcare / customer care


Webcare: The act of engaging in online interactions with
(complaining) consumers, by actively searching the web to
address consumer feedback (e.g., questions, concerns, and
complaints)” (Van Noort & Willemsen, 2012, p. 133)



- Monitoring: search on SNS but there’s also a selection of monitoring tools like
hootsuite/coosto/ob4wan etc. for quick investigations to see who’s talking about you and what
is their influence and respond to it.
- Considering: When to respond
o Block: making it impossible to post on a company’s (social media) page
▪ Advantage:
• Good to filter hate messages or other violations / spam accounts
• When you don’t want people to be associated with your company
▪ Disadvantages:
• People will find other ways to use NeWOM e.g. third parties or other
channels
• Less approachable/accessible
o Sensor/delete: at a minimum, 48% (of the sampled corporations, n = 12) are likely to
delete negative comments
▪ Detect censorship:
• Customer references to previous comments that are not available
(anymore)
• Corporate pages only contain positive comments
• Organization publicly announces that negative (or obscene, etc)
comments will not be published
• Or that postings that are not directly related to main topic are not
permitted
• Or that customer postings are not allowed at all
▪ Advantages:
• Privacy issues: you don’t want people to share their private info
▪ Disadvantages
• Can enhance negative feelings that you want to share even more
- Responding: organisations should respond, various studies indicated that people are more
satisfied after receiving a response in reply to NeWOM – but you have to know the
complainant.

, o What’s the customer’s intent?
o What are the customer’s desires?
o What are the motives?
o What gratifications is the customer looking for?
- Measuring:

Complainants with different desires
Grégoire et al. (2015): good, bad, and ugly complaints
Difference between whether a customer asks for help, or tries to damage the organization
- Good: directness & boasting
- Bad: badmouthing & tattling
- Ugly: spite & feeding the vultures

, Van Noort & Willemsen (2012)*: effects of proactive versus reactive webcare
Reactive: customer asks for responds or an @ mention is used. (on the right) → more need for a
response
Proactive: venting frustrations rather than seeking an solution. (on the left)




Findings:
- Responding to NeWOM by means of webcare increases brand evaluations (better to respond
than not to respond)
- No main difference between reactive / proactive approach
- But, did found a distinction for platform types
o Reactive: no platform difference on brand evaluations nor perceptions of human voice
(so always respond)
o Proactive: only respond on positive brand evaluations on a brand-generated platform
(in contrast to a consumer-generated platform) – can feel intrusive
▪ Also, people perceived the brand as demonstrating more a human voice on
this platform
➔ try to estimate whether the consumer desires a reply or not

Weitzl (2019): constructive and vindictive complainants




Constructive: (on the right)
- Complaining goals can only be achieved by receiving a response from the company
- Receptive to webcare
- Seek for redress to restore relationship with brand
Use social media to increase public pressure to find a solution (Act of constructive feedback to
help the brand to improve its performance)
➔ Customer care and public relations (could be marketing if they got constructive feedback)
Vindictive: (on the left)
- Do not need a response from the company to achieve goal
- Webcare is rather inappropriate
- Complaints serve as means to reduce frustration and anxiety
- Thus: venting, harm the organization, warn others
➔ Public relations – control the reputation

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller kellyvanhelvoirt1. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $5.16. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75391 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$5.16  2x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart