The social psychology of communication (PSB3ESP03)
Summary
Exam Summary Social Psychology of Communication (22/23) Readings/Articles Week2-Week7
20 views 1 purchase
Course
The social psychology of communication (PSB3ESP03)
Institution
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen (RuG)
Bullet-point summary of Social Psychology of Communication (PSB3E-SP03) article readings of the RUG!
Readings are according to the syllabus of 2022/2023. The summary includes all articles and mandatory readings from week 2 until week 7 and is formulated largely in bullet points, as it is easier t...
The social psychology of communication (PSB3ESP03)
All documents for this subject (7)
Seller
Follow
stenesis
Reviews received
Content preview
1
This summary was made by Maria A. Mueller.
Week 2 Notes
1) Elbert, S.P., & Dijkstra, A. (2014). An experimental test of the relationship between voice
intonation and persuasion in the domain of health. Psychology & Health, 29, 1014–1031.
http://proxy-ub.rug.nl/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2014.903482
- Speech rate, voice pitch, fluency, intensity and intonation (Betonung) influence a
persuasive process (e.g. telephone sales persons)
- Research aimed at understanding the workings of intonation as a paralinguistic cue
associated with the source in the process of behaviour change
- How intonation may influence respondent’s behavioral intention when persuaded
auditorily
- Intonation: variation of pitch while speaking, indicator of speech melody
- Intonation gives meaning to the message as a whole (including grammatical +
information structure) and gives emphasis on certain words by vocally stressing
them
- Also used to transfer info about attitudes and emotions of the speaker
- Positive correlations between intonation and persuasiveness, source status and
solidarity
- If highly involved in the message, intonation + purchase involvement positively
correlated
- more intonation -> more persuasion
- optimum for intonation in persuasion > has a limit to how effective intonation on
persuasion is the more it is utilized
- might use intonation to elicit mental representations of persuasive outcomes
- when recipient is involved in outcome, self-threat and responsibility is induced
- self-threat: the state of feeling inconsistent, non-adaptive and inadequate
- the self is therefore held responsible
- self-affirmation theory (Steele, 1988): People are motivated to lower this aversive
state which can be done by accepting the health info and change the health behavior
in the advocated direction (e.g.)
- persuasive information may also be met with defense mechanisms in reaction to
self-threat (fear control process to restore the self)
- emotional overload caused by intonation levels may lead to defensive reactions,
inhibiting persuasion
- higher intonation would lead to less persuasion
- When there is a defensive reaction at work in function of protecting the self, a self-
affirmation procedure should lower defences and increase persuasion after listening
to a message with a high level of intonation
- Ppl with perception that their health is poor: Defensive reactions elicited & might
react differently to self-threat after made aware of the possible consequences
- People aware of their poor health may relate to information of current state -> can
be solved by adopting behavioral change -> persuasive message congruent with the
own need to be more healthy
, 2
- People with perception that their health is good: no need to change as health is
already good, incongruent with the own need -> feelings of self-threat more likely to
be solved by defensiveness than by adopting behavioral change
- Study 1: relation between intonation and persuasion will be tested, intonation
manipulated into speech w/ low/medium/high lvl of intonation
- Hypothesis 1a) and a high level of intonation will lead to less persuasion compared
to a moderate level of intonation (Hypothesis 1b)
- Study 2: Replicate Study 1’s findings + unravel aspect of underlying process
regarding the lowered persuasion after listening to a message with a high level of
intonation
- In self-affirmation, important individual characteristics of participants are affirmed +
makes ppl feel good abt themselves, therefore forcing a psychological state of open-
mindedness -> people dare to face the potential threat and they accept the threat
without denial -> increased potential for persuasion
- Discussion: high level of intonation lowered persuasion but only in respondents who
considered their health good
, 3
- From self-threat perspective, self-affirmation procedure prevented drop in
persuasion aka defenses were in function to protect the self, inhibiting persuasion
- Ppl with poor perceived health status not affected by self-affirmation procedure ->
no defense processes at work, instead reported high intentions to engage in
behavioral change
- When encountered with self-threat, ppl in good health acted defensively, ppl with
poor health, acted on the behavioral change
- When recipients are not so much interested in the message, higher intonation
lowered message acceptance when involvement was low
- Through intonation information density is increased and more meaning is included in
message
- High intent of intonation may signal persuasion and therefore disrupt the process
- Intonation may provide information about the source and its credibility
2) Fuertes, J.N., Potere, J.C., & Ramirez, K.Y. (2002). Effects of speech accents on
interpersonal evaluations: Implications for counseling practice and research. Cultural
Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8, 346-356.
http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy-
ub.rug.nl/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2002- 18613-003&site=ehost-
live&scope=site
- Speech accents are used by listeners as immediate markers for assessing background
and character of speakers
- Assessments shape listener’s perceptions of and behavior toward the accented
speaker
- Accents have been used to evaluate speaker’s background, social status,
competence, social attractiveness, personality, and similarity with the listener
- In English speaking countries accents shown to stimulate discrimination +
stereotypes
- Accent Prestige Theory (APT, Giles, 1975): According to ATP, ppl in the UK whose
English was accented with “received pronunciation” or “first-class” accents are
generally accorded to higher prestige on “status” and” solidarity” dimensions of
interpersonal evaluation
- Status: perceived intelligence, education, social class, and success of the speaker
- Solidarity: perceived friendliness, trustworthiness, and kindness of the speaker
- Standard accents are those of the dominant group in society
- Standard-accented speakers tend to be rated more favorably than ppl with foreign
or nonstandard accents
- On solidarity ground, non-standard accented ppl tend to give higher ratings to the
same non-standard accented ppl whereas standard accented speakers give similar
ratings to both (regarding solidarity)
- Effects of accents mediated by formality or context as immediately associated with
- Accents tied to social class
- Similar accents affects perceptions of similarity in beliefs and values w/ speaker
- Nonaccented speakers rather accepted accented speakers in informal contexts while
preferring nonaccented speakers overall
, 4
- Communication Accommodation Theory (Giles, 1973): Extension of the convergence
and divergence model of accented speech, suggests that individuals tend to adjust
their accent and use of English when speaking to someone with a different accent
- Done to fulfill some interpersonal goal, e.g. gain social approval or to demonstrate
in-group affiliation
- Participants in a study tended to “upgrade” their accents to match the formality of
the context (ceiling effect)
- Men less able than women to accommodate to the cultivated accent
- Here, accommodation took place to the formal context of the situation and to the
accent of the speaker, and women were found to be more accommodating than men
- The more similar the accent, the easier the information is to remember
- Explained by the allocation of limited cognitive resources to tasks
- More attention is paid to understand the accent therefore taking up cognitive
resources for processing the information
- Accented speakers rated less negatively in informal contexts than formal
- Proximity to the receiver and formality of setting where accent is most discernable
elicits the most negative reactions
- Accents also impact (through discrimination) job competence for hiring, promotion,
and termination
- Universal-diverse orientation: Refers to multicultural awareness and an
appreciation of differences and similarities between self and others
- Speech accents influence respondent’s evaluations of accented counseling
psychologists/therapists
➔ Speech accents lead to lower ratings for therapists on various counseling-related
and status-stressing dimensions, such as perceptions of therapist expertness and
attractiveness. These results also suggest that speech accents lead to lower
solidarity-related evaluations, for example, by decreasing expected rapport and
willingness to work with the accented therapist in therapy. These findings also
suggest that speech accent effects appear to be me- diated by listeners’ level of
universal–diverse orientation or multicultural awareness.
- In-group vs out-group perspective
3) Poyatos, F. (2002). Nonverbal communication across disciplines. Volume II. Paralanguage,
kinesics, silence, personal and environmental interaction. Chapter I. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins. http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy-
ub.rug.nl/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=86769&site=ehost-
live&scope=site&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_1
- Voice characteristics that differentiate individuals: timbre, resonance,
intensity/volume, tempo, pitch (levels, interval, range), intonation range, syllabic
duration, and rhythm
- Qualities are differentiated by factors
➔ Biological: sex and age for timbre (vocal band size differs)
➔ Physiological: long-term malfunctions or traumatized states (e.g. pitch disorders
bc of abnormal vocal-fold growth or hormonal therapy)
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller stenesis. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $6.90. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
